Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gehenna: Where Death Lives
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Gehenna: Where Death Lives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small independent film, I can't find anything which would make it notable. Cites to its own website and imdb... that is just about every movie ever made. Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ‡ ᐁT₳LKᐃ 22:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Significant content seems to have been copied from https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1327284950/gehenna-where-death-lives -- not enough to warrant speedy deletion as a blatant copyvio, but definitely enough to require it to be fixed by rewriting if this is not deleted. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Alts:
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Found it spoken of in depth in Dread Central,[1] but it needs more. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete winning "The New York Science Fiction Film Festival Inaugural Award" is not sufficient for notability, and no other claim is presented. The article as written is filled with puffery. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Notable for award but puffery should be fixed. Puffery is not a criteria for deletion, though. Department of Cheese (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - not seeing where it passes WP:NFILM, and it certainly doesn't meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 01:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.