Overall: New article. Well cited, most of the citations are scholarly articles behind paywalls, so I assume good faith regarding copyvio. The hook is interesting to people with no linguistic background. The hook is in the article - I found it interesting that Klingenheben himself used a plural term in German, whereas a singular English term was coined. There's a few redlinks in the article, I don't see anything in the guidelines against this - I imagine even in the vast repository of Wikipedia, Hausa linguistic rules are still relatively obscure. I'm going to go ahead and approve ALT0. I think ALT1 requires too much specialized knowledge for the main page. Thanks! Annwfwn (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, Annwfwn! And yeah, there are some glaring blindspots not just on Hausa linguistic rules, but historical linguistics in general, so I'm trying to help. Agree that ALT0 is most accessible. Thanks again for the review. ThaesOfereode (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)